Wednesday, April 8, 2020

Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE): Important Intel for Private Patrol Operators and Private Investigators

At the end of March 2020, the American economy met a man-made economic disaster after the arrival of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19). As part of the governor’s executive order, many “non-essential” businesses were forced to close to prevent the spread of COVID-19.  If our local, state, and federal government believed so strongly in temporarily shutting down progress in the US economy—in the distant future—I foresee that new private patrol operator (PPO) or private investigator (PI) qualified manager applicants will be tested on the legal mandates of issuing personal protective equipment (PPE). Even if you have managed your security or investigations business for any length of time, I strongly suggest you consider my research and opinions.

Authority

The primary authority for the California Code of Regulations (CCR) is its affirmation of, “This order shall apply to all persons employed in professional, technical, clerical, mechanical, and similar occupations whether paid on a time, piece rate, commission, or other basis… (CCR, Title 8, Section 11040.1).” In Section 11040.2(O), the professions of “guard” and “investigator” are specified. The order confers an employee certain rights, specifically, the right to PPE if certain conditions apply. I suggest you read Section 11040 in its entirety to understand the conditions and exceptions, but if not or when in doubt, you should assume that your employee has the right to PPE.

Mandatory Risk Assessment

As an employer, CCR Title 8, Section 3380 requires you to conduct a risk assessment of the employee’s workplace and its conditions. The assessment must be signed/certified. If hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of PPE, you must (1) select, and have each affected employee use, the types of PPE that will protect the affected employee from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment; (2) communicate selection decisions to each affected employee; and (3) select PPE that properly fits each affected employee. After the assessment, you must provide training to the employee on how to use the PPE. As the employer, the law requires you to pay for the PPE (Labor Code 6401).

Standard of Care

As the employer, no matter where your employee is stationed, you have a duty to provide a "safe and healthful" environment (Labor Code 6404) and "to do every other thing reasonably necessary to protect the life, safety, and health of employees (Labor Code 6403)."  For example, you may be familiar with the injury and illness prevention programs required by Section 3203 of Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations, that require employers to show their employees how to lift something appropriately to prevent a back/neck injury (Labor Code 6403.5(a)).

In a negligence claim, the plaintiff will attempt to show you did not meet a standard of care and will often refer to laws or customs designed to prevent injury or contamination. For this reason, you must provide PPE that is designed as intended and that meets lab testing standards for its intended use (CCR Tile 8, Section 3380(a)(2) refers to CCR Title 8, Section 3206). In other words, you cannot issue a cloth-only mask for an employee working in an airborne-pathogen rich environment, or issue cloth gloves in a bloodborne pathogen setting. The investigator assigned to a surveillance post on a dusty hill, ought to be wearing a mask designed for dust particles. And those assigned to areas that accommodate the hiding or hosting of used syringes, should have access to puncture resistance gloves and sharps storage containers.

Contracts that Necessitate PPE

The most common types of contracts that commonly necessitate the use of PPE are agreements involving hospitals, medical facilities, construction sites, and hazardous material sites. I would also not be surprised if—due to the COVID-19 outbreak—if clubs, bars, shopping centers, or other areas of public gathering, would necessitate the use of PPE; however, at this point of time, this idea is nothing more than speculation, but growing in popularity. The better business practice is to issue PPE when your county Public Health Officer mandates wearing PPE (Health and Safety Code Sections 101040101085, and 120175) or when your employee asks for it. A lack of effective PPE supplies on the global or local market is not an excuse. Always prepare for the worst. If you have any questions about whether there are orders mandating such practice, click here and consult with the public health officer assigned to your county.

Disclaimer

I am not an attorney and no information discussed here cannot be construed as legal or professional advice. I am not associated with the Bureau of Security and Investigative Services. You should not make any financial, professional, or legal decisions based on the information in this discussion without the advice of a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction. The information may be incorrect. Engage at your own risk.

S/  Shaun E. Sundahl, Author of The Legal Investigator and the Private Patrol Operator.
Copyright 2020 by Shaun E. Sundahl